Losing Sleep Over Fire Safety Compliance

As practitioners right across the UK continually strive to improve upon fire safety and building standards in the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, Karen Trigg discusses the pressure now exerted on specialised housing landlords in their ongoing efforts to keep residents safe.

For landlords, providing residents with a safe environment is key. For residents living in specialised settings, such as sheltered housing, extra care and supported living accommodation, fire safety is critical. In fact, landlords and the providers of specialised housing and houses of multiple occupancy (HMOs) have a Duty of Care under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 to ensure that their properties meet all aspects of fire safety compliance.

Yet, right now, question marks hang heavy over the state of fire safety in the UK. Each week, the news highlights a number of incidents, suggesting a lax approach toward fire safety compliance by some. While it’s true that the running of HMOs and specialised housing facilities is more varied, fire safety compliance remains the same for all.

Vulnerability at night

In 2017, the National Fire Chiefs Council produced a comprehensive guide entitled ‘Fire Safety in Specialised Housing’. The guide includes a series of recommendations designed to protect the estimated three-quarters of a million residents in specialised housing. As well as escape routes and warning signs, fire doors are recognised in the document as a major contributing factor to fire safety. For all buildings, fire doors are the first line of defence when a fire does occur, helping to protect premises by preventing or slowing down smoke and fire from spreading.

What’s more, fire doors act as protection for residents when they’re most vulnerable – while they’re sleeping. It’s well documented that most fires in the home occur when people are asleep (between the hours of 10.00 pm and 6.00 am). Through compartmentalisation, fire doors are key in providing occupants those extra seconds and, in a building with multiple residents, this can be a huge contributing factor for successful escape.

With this in mind, the importance of correct installation and maintenance cannot be understated. Without it, fire doors simply will not function effectively.

However, all-too-often it’s the case that fire doors are the one piece of equipment subject to neglect, becoming a secondary concern for landlords and facility managers alike. In some cases, they’re the first item to be downgraded in a specification as a way of saving money. Even if the correct fire door is chosen, they can often be used incorrectly, being left propped open or even locked, and are often badly maintained and damaged.

It’s no surprise to learn that fire door failure is still a prominent problem in many residential settings. In 2015 alone, 58% of all fire door-related fines were issued to landlords of HMOs in the UK. Adding to this, a recent report led by the Fire Door Inspection Scheme (which provides online training in fire door safety) found that 61% of those fire doors inspected had fire or smoke seals missing or were installed incorrectly.

At the same time, one-in-three had gaps of 3 mm or more between the door and the frame, making them susceptible to increased fire damage. Failure to meet the stringent regulations associated with fire safety compliance can result in legal action and heavy financial penalties, so why are we seeing such a large number of incidents in this sector?

A sound sleep

Karen Trigg

Karen Trigg

In order to remain compliance, education is key. It’s now as important as ever for landlords and facility managers as a collective to improve their understanding of fire safety and alleviate the pressure associated with fire safety compliance. When used correctly, fire doors can protect occupants from danger for anywhere between 20 minutes and 120 minutes (depending on the specification of the door).

Using what’s commonly known as ‘the five-point check’ – checking certification, gaps, seals, hinges and closing mechanics – enables a user to see if a fire door is functioning as it should be. Responsibility lies with the landlord, but any staff should also have a responsibility to report any doors within HMOs or specialised housing facilities that are not functioning correctly.

The smallest of changes in a fire door’s function can have detrimental effects. Although landlords have ultimate responsibility for ensuring that fire doors are compliant and fit for purpose, sometimes a full inspection may need to be carried out by a qualified specialist. Should an issue be found with a fire door, it’s important to realise that contacting a certified inspector is an option as opposed to leaving matters to chance.

There’s no longer an excuse to leave fire safety to chance. Moreover, there’s no longer a need to lose sleep over fire safety compliance. Begin with the basic checks and seek further advice should it be required. No occupants of specialised housing or HMOs deserve to live in constant fear of fire safety.

Karen Trigg is Business Development Manager at Allegion UK

Sources 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-reform-fire-safety-order-2005-guidance-note-enforcement

https://www.nationalfirechiefs.org.uk/write/MediaUploads/NFCC%20Guidance%20publications/NFCC_Specialised_Housing_Guidance_-_Copy.pdf

https://www.firstalert-online.co.uk/fire-safety-facts/

https://www.firedoorsafetyweek.co.uk/council-and-social-housing/

https://www.ifsecglobal.com/fire-features/infographic-5-common-fire-door-faults/

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014 and as Editor of The Paper (Pro-Activ Publications' dedicated business newspaper for security professionals) in September 2015. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk Xtra at Pro-Activ Publications in May 2018.

Related Posts