Home Cyber High-profile GDPR fines “having greatest impact” on UK cyber security spend

High-profile GDPR fines “having greatest impact” on UK cyber security spend

by Brian Sims

Research conducted by data security company Clearswift has highlighted that the recent large General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-centric fines levied against enterprise giants British Airways (BA) and Marriott International have had something of a ripple effect on Board-level involvement and spending plans in relation to cyber security within UK financial sector firms.

The research, which surveyed senior business decision-makers within enterprise financial organisations in the UK, highlights the Information Commissioner’s Office’s (ICO) recent judgements on BA and Marriott International as a key turning point when it comes to addressing cyber security. Almost one-third of companies (32%) referenced these recent GDPR fines as being the primary reason for an increase in Board-level involvement and/or provision for IT security spending. 

“It has been over a year since the GDPR has been enforced and organisations were wondering if there were any teeth behind the regulations,” said Dr Guy Bunker, CTO at Clearswift. “These fines have clearly sent shockwaves into the industry and are now serving as a blueprint for how the ICO will handle cases of this nature. By giving out such large ‘intentions to fine’ notices, the ICO has delivered a strong message that it’s not afraid to reprimand household names.” 

Bunker added: “Boards of Directors are now sitting up and taking notice of GDPR compliance and the role cyber security plays in it. However, it’s not just about taking notice. It’s also about the need to invest to maximise their ability to keep the organisation safe from new threats. Revisiting their ‘defence in depth’ strategy to augment with enhanced security solutions including both the boundary and the cloud, and implementing more stringent policies, is going to be critical for securing the critical information they hold within the organisation.”

Supply chain threats and ransomware

Other key threats identified by respondents included supply chain threats (25%), whereby attackers seek to damage an organisation by targeting less-secure elements in the supply network. Ransomware attacks (24%), such as the infamous WannaCry episode in 2017 (where malicious software denies access to a computer system or critical data until a ransom is paid) also figured highly on the list.

Interestingly, when looking solely at companies with over 5,000 employees, the fear of ransomware was perceived to be the key reason why firms are bolstering their spending. This isn’t surprising when you consider firms infected with ransomware have, in some cases, ended up reverting to pen and paper until back up-and-running again.

When asked about spending levels, the majority of financial businesses would like to see an increase in cyber security investment (73%), with almost one-in-five (17%) UK firms surveyed reporting that their budgets currently stood ‘well below the adequate level’. Fortunately, this figure dropped dramatically (to 5%, in fact) when looking at firms with over 5,000 employees. This is a possible sign that larger firms have already made additional investment to deal with the ever-changing cyber ‘threatscape’.

Focus for investment

When asked where their organisation currently focuses its cyber security investment, data loss prevention technology is a primary area for over half (53%) of UK financial businesses, followed by database security (42%), regulatory compliance (40%) and advanced threat protection (40%).

Bunker also said: “Increasing investment in the latest data loss prevention solutions will help mitigate inadvertent and malicious data loss risks. Furthermore, with the GDPR, organisations need to be aware that receiving unauthorised data can cause issues. They need to better understand how information flows through the organisation in order to tailor security solutions around how the business operates. In doing so, it will highlight where the biggest risks are and how the most cost-effective solutions can be deployed to increase protection and prevent a hefty fine.”

You may also like

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More