Forensic science “in a state of crisis” and “must be reformed” warns House of Lords Select Committee

Forensic science in England and Wales “is in trouble” and, unless the Home Office and the Ministry of Justice act now, “crimes may go unsolved and the number of miscarriages of justice may increase”. To ensure the effective delivery of justice, the House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee has called for urgent reforms to forensic science in England and Wales in order to regain its world-class reputation.

The UK was once regarded as world-leading in forensic science, but an absence of high-level leadership, a lack of funding and an insufficient level of R&D now means the UK’s lagging behind others. According to the Committee, the forensic science market isn’t properly regulated, thereby creating a state of crisis and a threat to the criminal justice system.

Lord Patel, chairman of the House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee, said: “A free society is dependent on the rule of law which, in turn, relies on the equality of access to justice. Simultaneous budget cuts and reorganisation, together with exponential growth in the need for new services such as digital evidence, has placed forensic science providers under extreme pressure. The end result is a forensic science market which, unless properly regulated, will soon suffer the shocks of major forensic science providers going out of business and putting the justice system in jeopardy.”

Further, Lord Patel stated: “The situation we’re in cannot continue. Since 2012, the Home Office has made empty promises to give the Forensic Science Regulator statutory powers, but still no action has been taken. We believe that seven years is an embarrassing amount of time to delay legislation. Our forensic science provision has now reached breaking point and a complete overhaul is needed. If our recommendations are implemented and the Government adequately invests in forensic science, our forensic science market can return to a world-leading position.”

The delivery of justice depends on the integrity and accuracy of forensic science evidence and the trust that society has in it. According to the House of Lords Select Committee, these failings must be recognised and changes made.

Recommendations in the report

In its detailed 66-page report entitled ‘Forensic Science and the Criminal Justice System: A Blueprint for Change’, the Committee makes several recommendations including the following:

*A Forensic Science Board should be created to deliver a new forensic science strategy and to take responsibility for forensic science in England and Wales

Dr Gillian Tully

Dr Gillian Tully

*The remit and resources of the Dr Gillian Tully, the Forensic Science Regulator, should be significantly reformed and expanded to include responsibility for regulating the market and, given a number of statutory powers, bolster trust in the quality of forensic science including: the issue of improvement notices and fines, the ability to rescind a forensic science provider’s accreditation and inspect, without notice, accredited forensic science providers

*The Legal Aid Agency should liaise with the market regulation arm within the expanded role of the Forensic Science Regulator to set new pricing schemes for forensic testing and expert advice for defendants

*The Ministry of Justice and the Home Office should invest in research of automation techniques for data retrieval and analysis to tackle the issues with digital forensic analysis

*To return the UK to its position as world-leading, a National Institute for Forensic Science should be created to set strategic priorities for forensic science R&D and to co=ordinate and direct research and funding

Keeping pace with developments

Commenting on the report, Dr Sarah Morris (senior lecturer in forensic computing at Cranfield University and who gave evidence in front of the House of Lords Select Committee) said: “It’s vital for the criminal justice system that digital forensics keeps pace with the latest technological developments. Digital forensics is a fast-paced field where each device, each software update and each operating system can have a significant impact, not only on the types of artefacts available but also their meaning.”

Dr Morris added: “The House of Lords Select Committee has rightly identified the gaps in understanding between forensic specialists and the legal profession. Too often, too much pressure is put on digital forensic investigators to conclude their investigations. There needs to be a greater understanding of the timescales involved in order to conduct a thorough analysis.”

Finally, Dr Morris said: “The Committee’s call for increased understanding of the field within the legal profession, increased research provision and greater collaboration between the various forensic science professionals is very welcome. I hope that the Home Office considers its recommendations and responds positively to them.”

Response from the Regulator

Forensic Science Regulator Dr Gillian Tully responded: “I welcome the far-reaching and thoughtful report from the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. This report makes clear that urgent action is required from the Government and the police in England and Wales if we’re to maintain high scientific standards.”

Tully also stated: “I welcome the Committee adding to the repeated calls to grant this office statutory powers to uphold standards and ensure effective delivery of justice. While enforcement action would be a last resort, it’s an important lever to enable the Forensic Science Regulator to have the impact it needs.”

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014 and as Editor of The Paper (Pro-Activ Publications' dedicated business newspaper for security professionals) in September 2015. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk Xtra at Pro-Activ Publications in May 2018.

Related Posts