FIA Technical Briefing

Posted On 15 Jan 2018
Comment: Off

False fire alarms are a real problem. Last year, a Government report highlighted the fact that 44% of Fire and Rescue Service call-outs turn out to be for false alarm episodes. The cost to businesses due to disruption and the cost in terms of time and resources for the Fire and Rescue Services can be considerable but, as Robert Yates outlines, those costs are also avoidable when appropriate system design parameters are rigorously followed.

In conjunction with other partners including the Association of British Insurers, British Approvals for Fire Equipment, the Building Research Establishment and the CBRE, the Fire Industry Association (FIA) determined to conduct a research programme on false alarms alongside the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS). The report subsequently published in 2016 highlighted a number of sources of false alarms, with the activation of a manual Call Point shown as the cause of false alarms in 12% of all cases (due to physical impact on the Call Point or accidental or malicious activation).

The report concluded that fitting protective covers on Call Points could reduce the level of false alarms by up to 16%. As a result of the document, it was decided to incorporate compensatory measures into the re-write of BS 5839 Part 1 (to be BS 5839 Part 1: 2017). This guidance document examines the benefits of Call Point protection and where and how they should be fitted in line with recommendations highlighted in British Standards.

It was originally thought that, by fitting a cover to a Call Point, it was then no longer a Type A Call Point, but instead a Type B Call Point because it was considered as requiring two actions for activation. However, on reviewing the requirements of EN 54-11 (Annex A), moving a protective cover doesn’t break the frangible element so the Call Point remains a Type A and isn’t a Type B. BS 5839-1: 2017 Clause 20 has been amended.

The following recommendations are applicable. The method of operation of all manual Call Points in a system should be that of Type A as specified in BS EN 54-11. All Call Points should be identical unless there’s a special reason for differentiation. Other than in those premises occupied predominantly by trained staff, all manual Call Points should be fitted with a protective hinged cover, which is moved to gain access to the frangible element.

As a Code of Practice isn’t retrospective, there’s no requirement to fit protective covers to existing installations. It would be prudent, though, for end users to have protective covers fitted to any Call Point that has evidence of initiating – or has the potential to initiate – a false alarm scenario.

Recommendations from the SFRS report suggest that all manual Call Points should be fitted with a protective cover to help reduce incidents of accidental activation due to breaking the ‘glass’. Also, the recommendations include (in certain vulnerable areas) side impact protection for Call Points to prevent inadvertent operation due to impacts from trolleys and other such objects.

Activation protection

There are three basic categories of false activation: accidental (ie due to a misunderstanding of the unit, fumbling for a light switch or being confused with door release), opportunistic (ie a passing nuisance such as a school prank/drunken fun) and malicious (ie the deliberate attempt to operate, for example by a casual vandal).

Pressure on the frangible element, an object striking the manual Call Point or vehicular contact would all point to the need for protection. Manual Call Points should be prominently sited and visually distinguishable. Even in those situations where they’ve been flush-mounted in locations where they’ll be seen, this can still result in accidental or malicious damage.

Although the recommendations in BS 5839-1 for siting manual Call Points in relation to false alarms state that they shouldn’t be located where they’re likely to be exposed to accidental damage, in reality this isn’t always feasible.

Potential hazards include impact by – but not limited to – trolleys, trucks, hospital beds, forklifts, people traffic and cleaning operations.

Protection should be selected appropriate to the source of false alarms and taking into account the application. There’s a definite need to keep a clear space around all fire detectors and Call Points.

Protection should be appropriately selected taking the following into account:
• Ability to test the Call Point: Where the protection completely surrounds the Call Point, care should be taken to ensure that any test/reset key can be easily fitted without inhibition
• Ability to see any indication: Where the protection completely encloses the Call Point, this should not inhibit any indication that the Call Point has been activated
• Ability to operate/maintain: Consideration should be given such that the protection can be fully opened without any form of obstruction. For example, a cover that strikes a shelf or perhaps a wall and doesn’t open fully would not be suitable
• Ability to replace seals: Where anti-tamper seals are fitted to the protection, this should only be replaced by a seal that requires a similar force to break
• Ability to transmit/receive radio signals (radio re: alarm systems only): Consideration needs to be given such that the protective cover doesn’t impede or otherwise inhibit the radio signal of radio fire alarm systems. Advice should be sought from the system manufacturer

Manual Call Points need to be prominently sited, readily distinguishable from non-fire alarm Call Points and distributed at a given premises such that, from any point in the building, it’s actually impossible for an individual to leave the storey or the building without passing a manual Call Point.

Time to sounding

Sufficient Call Points must be provided to minimise, to a reasonable extent, the delay between discovery of a fire and the sounding of the alarm. Where the fire hazard level is high and rapid fire development is anticipated, this delay needs to be commensurately shorter.

If they’re present in unsupervised areas, manual Call Points can be subject to malicious operation. For this reason, they’re not normally provided in, for example, public common areas of shopping complexes and certain public houses. In public car parks within a building, the use of an emergency voice communication system could be considered instead of manual Call Points.

In the event of an evacuation signal, individuals evacuate the building via an exit that leads to a place of ultimate safety. In other words, a place in which there’s no immediate or future danger from fire.

To conform to BS 5839-1, manual Call Points are sited adjacent to all storey exits and exits to open air that lead to a place of ultimate safety. Therefore, if, for example, a door leads to an enclosed courtyard that’s in the open air, but has no exit to a place of ultimate safety, this door wouldn’t need to be provided with a manual Call Point as the provision of one at this location could infer that the door leads to a place of safety.

Moreover, in order to escape, people would need to re-enter the building and therefore be afforded an opportunity to operate the fire alarm system on their way towards a suitable exit. Similarly, the same would apply to a door leading to a roofed area from which there’s no suitable means of escape (for example, an external escape stairway).

Manual Call Points should be fixed at a height of 1.4 metres above the finished floor level, at easily accessible, well-illuminated and conspicuous positions free from potential obstruction. They should also be sited against a contrasting background to assist in easy recognition. A lower mounting height is acceptable in those circumstances where there’s a high likelihood that the first person to raise a fire alarm will be a wheelchair user.

Subject to approval

In public car parks, any use of an emergency voice communication system in lieu of manual Call Points should be subject to approval by the relevant enforcing authority, while any system deployed should conform to BS 5839-9. All outstations should be Type B outstations as defined in BS 5839-9. For its past, the master station should be sited in a permanently manned location (such as a Control Room).

It’s important to be fully up-to-date with the standards and wholly aware of the guidance. A full guidance document is available to download as a PDF from the FIA’s website (www.fia.uk.com) under the ‘Resources’ tab.

Robert Yates is Technical Manager at the Fire Industry Association

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014 and as Editor of The Paper (Pro-Activ Publications' dedicated business newspaper for security professionals) in September 2015. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk Xtra at Pro-Activ Publications in May 2018.