Cyber Security: Attack Vectors Across the Next 12 Months

Jonathan Couch

Jonathan Couch

Cyber security professionals are currently busy sharing their predictions for the coming year, writes Jonathan Couch, who’s not a big fan of these types of predictions. That’s because what actually happens in any given year tends to be more of the same with one or two new, unique industry targets or types of attacks that have evolved.

For the most part, threat actors are not really that advanced or even ‘genius. Rather, they are just very good at taking advantage of the bureaucracy of security operations, networks and end users to allow them to make some money or steal information.

What we can say about 2019 is that attackers will increase those simple attacks that worked and leave behind those that didn’t work as well. With that in mind, what will be the unique attack vectors and big headlines that we can expect to witness this year?

OT Networks

‘OT’ is Operational Technology. Basically, the guts of what runs a lot of oil, gas and energy companies when it comes to extraction, generation and distribution. Most companies that have OT networks have snubbed technologies designed to secure IT networks because OT networks are ‘special’. They rely much more heavily on uptime and low latency and leverage unique technologies that traditional security tools may disrupt. There’s a tendency towards segregating these networks and only layering in minimal security. Most of the investment is put into monitoring tools such as performance monitoring rather than security monitoring.

In reality, modern OT networks run very similarly to traditional IT networks, but with fewer users and typically much older technology. I believe the big secret they are trying to hide by not implementing thorough security is that modern tools will not help much with the older technology and they don’t want to invest in another IT network where the costs could skyrocket.

With that conundrum in mind, 2019 is likely to have at least one major attack against an OT network that will cause the industry to take a good look at itself and figure out how to redesign in a secure manner.

Internet of Things

The Internet of Things (IoT) has long been the whipping child of ‘Security Armageddon’ predictions. I can find it in most predictions over the past five years, including my own.

The fact remains, though, that IoT security is still very weak at best. IoT devices are flooding the market and they’re still at that point in the maturity curve where usability is much more important than security. The providers are trying to create and expand a market of users with new and unique ways in which to automate our lives. Their focus is on capabilities and being first to market versus secure automation and investing their limited development resources to create functionality that’s also secure.

In 2019, we will start to hear more and more about IoT attacks. The IoT will become a major target once someone figures out how to monetise it. If threat actors can start to steal cars through an app (by unlocking and starting the car remotely) or gain access to user and/or banking information through smart meters outside homes, then they will start to target those technologies.

I go back to my previous statement on attackers. Attackers tend to go for easy targets that will gain them the biggest return. The IoT has a little more maturing and a little more market adoption to go before it becomes a major and regular target. That doesn’t keep it off my list, though. Attackers are looking at it and thinking about it. If someone finds a unique way in which to profit from these technologies or if a new product is launched that everyone just has to have, then 2019 may in fact be the year that IoT-centric scams start in earnest.

I’m still waiting for the robot calls to my virtual assistant to start. It’s just a matter of time…

Collaboration: ‘It’s a Thing’

The term ‘shared situational awareness’ was a huge thing in the US military in the 1990s and early 2000s. There was a lot of money going into projects that would tie together unique solutions (air war, ground war, sea war command and control maps, for example) so that a joint Task Force commander would know what each unit under his or her charge was doing. These technologies also served the purpose of sharing data between the services and sometimes between countries so that we all knew what others were doing, thereby reducing duplication of effort and preventing friendly fire incidents.

Along those philosophical lines, security collaboration (ie collaboration and communication between security teams) could become a big thing during 2019. It’s ironic that most organisations have jumped on the external information and intelligence sharing bandwagon, but very few have solid collaboration and information sharing between their internal security teams (Security Operations Centres, Incident Response, Threat Hunting, Red Team, Threat Intelligence and Vulnerability Management etc).

The Incident Response Team will spend hours and days collecting information and researching threats in order to remediate a breach, but that information is rarely centralised in a way that the Security Operations Centre or other security teams can leverage it. The same happens when other teams perform similar work. It’s rarely shared across the organisation in a way that it becomes stored and historical knowledge.

This lack of communication and collaboration is usually what attackers rely on in their attacks. In my past days of working in offensive cyber operations, we called it ‘finding the seams’. Identifying those areas where people, process or technology nestle against each other but don’t really overlap. Attackers could rely on information not being shared or handed off properly or efficiently, and could exploit that seam to gain access and hide.

Security collaboration

While taking advantage of the lack of collaboration isn’t new or unique, an expectation I have for 2019 will be the emergence of more technologies that address security team collaboration and the use of current technologies to better enable cross-team communication and shared situational awareness. Something will happen that should have been preventable that will highlight this lack of collaboration and leave organisations scrambling to seal the seams.

I stated in the beginning that these observations are not really predictions, but rather areas to watch in 2019. That said, organisations with OT networks – or that are incorporating IoT devices into their environments or grappling with silos between tools and teams – should do more than stand back and watch.

Start considering now how to align your resources so that the business can stay ahead of these possible attack vectors and also stay out of the media headlines.

Jonathan Couch is Senior Vice-President (Strategy) at ThreatQuotient

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014 and as Editor of The Paper (Pro-Activ Publications' dedicated business newspaper for security professionals) in September 2015. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk Xtra at Pro-Activ Publications in May 2018.

Related Posts