Are Funding Levels Actively Harming Public Safety and Security?

Karen Trigg

Karen Trigg

When restricted by budgets, safety and security standards can waver. Here, Karen Trigg discusses how to overcome financial challenges and outlines precisely why large budgets should not legitimise complacency when it comes to security provision. 

Addressing budgetary restrictions in public, Government-owned buildings has become a challenge. When stories about failing fire safety standards or poor security hit the national news, the root of the cause is almost never linked to financial restrictions. Granted, however, a lot of the time there are other, louder contributing factors. These may include lack of sufficient knowledge, training, emergency preparedness and so on.

Addressing budgetary restrictions is one thing. Breaking it down, and forming practical, legitimate and effective solutions and answers is quite another. How do facility managers and safety and security teams improve their current protocols if they don’t have sufficient budgets? The answer begins with proactivity. 

Rock and a hard place

Last year, a study conducted by Allegion UK found that more than 40% of healthcare facilities that felt their current security measures were compromised said this was because of underfunding or budgetary constraints. Budget cuts within the healthcare sector in particular have left many NHS practices and hospitals caught between a rock and a hard place, where the lack of funding has resulted in a number of issues beyond just safety and security concerns.

It’s becoming clearer that these types of facilities may be struggling when it comes to certain fire safety measures. Recently, East Sussex Healthcare Trust requested to be granted a bulk of capital funding to improve its fire safety measures following a “recommendation” from the Fire Service. The Trust initially planned to invest a significantly smaller amount (£750,000 per annum, in fact) on its fire safety measures, but decided to take action after the Fire Service expressed concern over the pace of work.

Therefore, with many of these types of facilities left clutching at straws, it’s necessary to start thinking about what to do if funding falls short. The circumstances above  indicate that, while the desire to better current protocols may be present, budget or other constraining factors may be limiting progress.

If this is the case for most, is it time we started raising greater awareness of the issues that come with budgeting pressures? Or perhaps it’s time to shift the focus entirely and bring the industry back to basics? That way, we can be sure complacency will not creep in no matter the budget size and proactivity will pave the way to productivity. 

Everyday actions 

Even the biggest safety and security budgets will not succeed in removing all risk. In fact, technology isn’t the be-all and end-all when it comes to heightening security. It’s actually the intangible measures which help to tie-up the loose ends and glue the entire system together.

A full comprehensive approach is key. Jerry Irvine, CIO of US IT outsourcing company Prescient Solutions, recently said that improving protocols has become more about implementing effective “security policies as opposed to simply buying security tools”. While Irvine speaks within the context of Internet technology, this statement rings true across safety and security within the construction industry as well.

This can include assessing current protocols so you can work out what needs altering or improving. One aspect that’s often overlooked is how all occupants within a building are integral to the success of safety and security. This is the one area which doesn’t require large budgets, but is perhaps one of the most effective and important aspects. 

A clear and effective emergency evacuation procedure – or lockdown protocol – can be helpful when it comes to safeguarding a premises against any potential risk including unauthorised entry. Many facilities are still without a lockdown procedure even though including one within a security strategy means heightened preparedness if any emergency situation were to occur. 

It’s easy to leave safety and security protocols up to facility managers or managing teams. However, it’s useful and worthwhile to involve staff or any of those who regularly use the building. This can include making sure staff are trained on aspects such as general fire safety regulations and emergency evacuation plans. Beyond this, in facilities such as hospitals or schools, simple things can be helpful with keeping people ‘in the know’ where it counts the most. This could be clearly signposting evacuation plans or fire safety tips such as not propping fire doors open.

Solutions for all 

Although these measures are incredibly effective when implemented correctly, they are not standalone solutions. In fact, these intangible measures are even more successful when combined with appropriate physical measures.

Again, however, some may shy away from upgrading old systems (or implementing new ones) for fear of improvements not being budget-friendly. Schools, for example, have always felt the pressure of intense underfunding. However, the industry has developed considerably in recent years and high-quality products and solutions are becoming increasingly accessible.

This means that, while these types of facilities may be up against the restrictions of budget, they’re still able to find and implement well-rounded and effective solutions. Also, they’re able to do so in such a way that benefits their specific requirements rather than opting for solutions purely based on cost-effectiveness. 

Being active 

Last year, one of the most pressing issues in the industry was a lack of sufficient knowledge. This came off the back of news stories such as the Grenfell Tower fire and Inquiry, which served as a wake-up call within the industry. However, there continues to be a certain lack of proactivity to make things better or even to just make things right.

When restricted by variables like budget, it’s important to remember that not only is there trustworthy help out there, but that budget isn’t always a testament to safety and security standards. As discussed, adopting a fully-integrated and holistic approach can improve protocols no end.

What’s more, feeling like you’re ‘in the dark’ doesn’t necessarily mean there’s no help out there. Sometimes, the best results can be achieved by choosing to actively and collaboratively seek out the right solution.

Karen Trigg is Business Development Manager at Allegion UK

Sources 

https://www.allegion.ca/content/dam/allegion-us-2/web-documents-2/Article/School_Security_on_a_Budget_109076.pdf

https://www.esecurityplanet.com/network-security/building-a-better-security-budget.html

https://webspm.com/articles/2015/10/01/safety-budget.aspx

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/may/22/hospitals-struggling-to-afford-new-equipment-after-nhs-budget-cuts

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014 and as Editor of The Paper (Pro-Activ Publications' dedicated business newspaper for security professionals) in September 2015. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk Xtra at Pro-Activ Publications in May 2018.

Related Posts