Anti-corruption champion Sir Eric Pickles tasked with examining electoral fraud

The issue of electoral fraud is being examined by the UK Cabinet Office

The issue of electoral fraud is being examined by the UK Cabinet Office

The UK Cabinet Office has announced that Sir Eric Pickles, the Government’s recently-appointed anti-corruption champion, is to review electoral fraud and make recommendations on what more could be done to tackle the issue.

According to the Cabinet Office, the Government has “made great strides” in improving confidence in the electoral system across recent years, with Individual Electoral Registration ensuring that checks are in place to make absolutely certain everyone on the electoral register is indeed who they say are.

The review will determine whether changes are needed to make the system more secure, and make recommendations as to what those changes should be.

John Penrose, Minister for Constitutional Reform, said: “Most people feel British elections can be trusted to deliver whatever people have voted for. That said, in a changing world we cannot afford to rest on our laurels. We must spot new or growing weaknesses in our election system and fix them before they turn into a problem like Tower Hamlets. Sir Eric’s work will provide the facts we need to do this properly and, given his years of experience with local Government, he’s the perfect man for the job.”

Further improvements to electoral integrity

In response, Sir Eric Pickles said: “The Government’s roll out of Individual Electoral Registration across Great Britain is a significant advance in creating an electoral register that’s secure from fraud. It’s important that we now look at other parts of the system to identify what more can be done to improve electoral integrity.”

Sir Eric Pickles: the Government's anti-corruption champion

Sir Eric Pickles: the Government’s anti-corruption champion

Pickles continued: “The British system is among the world’s most trusted democracies, but it’s essential that it remains so. The recent election court ruling in Tower Hamlets is a wake-up call that state bodies need to do far more to stamp out corruption and restore public confidence. Financial and electoral sleaze go hand in hand. If a dodgy politician is willing to break election law, they will not hesitate to syphon off taxpayers’ money for their own ends.”

In conclusion, Pickles explained: “The levels of reported incidents and allegations of electoral fraud in the UK do not suggest electoral fraud is widespread, but we cannot know how much goes undetected. It’s important that we close down any opportunities to commit fraud, whether this on the basis that actual evidence shows vulnerabilities are being targeted by fraudsters, or because there’s a potential risk or weakness in the system.”

Pickles asserted that the Government believes it’s important to keep the electoral system under review, to ensure that it remains robust and that measures are in place to continue to deter and prevent attempts to commit fraud.

Electoral Fraud Review: Terms of Reference

A ‘Call for Evidence’ is being issued as part of the review. Views will be sought from bodies such as the Electoral Commission and the Law Commission as well as those involved in running elections. The considered opinions of lawyers and academics with an interest in the field and law enforcement agencies such as the police service and the Crown Prosecution Service who deal with such allegations will be welcome.

The Terms of Reference for the Electoral Fraud Review are to:

*Examine what steps are necessary to stop voter registration fraud and error, postal voting fraud, impersonation, intimidation, bribery, treating and undue influence
*Review the role of councils, the police service and the Electoral Commission in deterring, identifying and prosecuting electoral fraud
*Consider the recommendations of Richard Mawrey QC in his recent Election Court judgement on fraud in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets
*Recommend to Government what practical changes are needed in terms of legislation, guidance and practice

*The consultation period is set to last for eight weeks, closing on 8 October 2015

**Feedback on the review should be submitted

***After considering all of the evidence, Sir Eric Pickles will provide a report to the Prime Minister (complete with recommendations and proposals for change) by the end of this year

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014 and as Editor of The Paper (Pro-Activ Publications' dedicated business newspaper for security professionals) in September 2015. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk Xtra at Pro-Activ Publications in May 2018.

Related Posts