“Over 90% of companies feel ill-equipped to manage risk posed by using third party organisations” outlines Deloitte

Almost nine-in-ten (87%) organisations have faced a disruptive incident involving third parties in the last three years, according to a new survey conducted by Deloitte, the professional services firm. Such incidents can include loss of data by a third party, or failure to deliver a service or product on time.

The Deloitte survey also highlights the increasing frequency and impact of these disruptions, illustrating the significant need for organisations to invest in better governance and risk management related to third parties.

Of the organisations surveyed, nearly all (94.3%) felt low-to-moderate levels of confidence in the tools and technology currently used to manage their third party risk, with similar sentiment expressed in supporting risk management processes (88.6%).

At the same time, 73.9% of respondents believe that third parties will play a highly important – or even critical – role in the year ahead. This figure is up from 60.3% a year or more earlier.

Kristian Park, partner and global head of third party governance and risk management at Deloitte, stated: “With reliance on third parties set to grow, now is the time to address the ‘execution gap’ between risk and readiness. The impact of third party incidents ranges from reputational damage, regulatory and data breaches through to actual lost revenue and future business. The increasing frequency of third party incidents, some of them high profile, has driven a shift in motivation among organisations to improve their risk management.”

Park continued: “Third parties are increasingly seen as a route to gaining competitive advantage. They’re often viewed as trusted advisors who bring in specialised skills or knowledge. It’s therefore also important to recognise the opportunity that third parties create for organisations.”

Fines resulting from third party failure

Last year, Deloitte calculated that fines issued directly from third party failure have ranged from £1.3 million to £35 million, reaching £650 million for those firms operating internationally and subject to global regulation. As the market value of a company is impacted by such fines, shareholders could incur losses of up to ten times the fine, with an average share price drop in the region of 2.55%.

Park went on to state: “The good news is that third party risk management is starting to feature consistently in Board-level discussions. Our latest survey found that over half (51.1%) of respondents were united in their ambition to have integrated third party risk management systems in place in the year ahead. Rolling out common and unified standards remains a challenge as businesses are increasingly decentralised. Encouragingly, though, 86% of those surveyed have already started the process.”

The 2016 global survey on third party governance and risk management is based on the responses of over 170 senior members of management from a variety of organisations, the majority of which had annual revenues in excess of US$1 billion.

Sectors involved included financial services, energy and resources, manufacturing, the public sector, technology, media and telecoms, consumer business, healthcare and life sciences and business, infrastructure and professional services.

Respondents were typically accountable for governance and risk management around third parties, with job roles encompassing chief finance officers, heads of procurement and vendor management, chief risk officers, heads of internal audit and those leading the compliance and information technology risk function.

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014 and as Editor of The Paper (Pro-Activ Publications' dedicated business newspaper for security professionals) in September 2015. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk Xtra at Pro-Activ Publications in May 2018.

Related Posts