Liberty begins legal proceedings in landmark ‘People versus Snoopers’ Charter’ challenge

Civil freedoms champion Liberty has issued a landmark legal challenge against what it calls the Government’s “extreme mass surveillance” regime, thereby setting in motion a judicial review of the Investigatory Powers Act. The organisation is challenging the unprecedented ‘bulk’ surveillance powers contained in the Act, which allow the State to monitor everybody’s web history and e-mail, text and phone records as well as “hack computers, phones and tablets” on what Liberty terms “an industrial scale”.

The Human Rights campaigning organisation sent a formal letter before action to the Government on 20 December last year, but has still not received a substantive response. Liberty has now applied to the High Court for permission to proceed.

The challenge is being crowdfunded via CrowdJustice, and has received widespread public support. In January, Liberty raised more than £50,000 from the public in less than a week, smashing its initial target of just £10,000.

More than 200,000 people signed a petition calling for the Act’s repeal after it passed late last year.

Silkie Carlo, policy officer at Liberty, commented: “This is our first step towards getting rid of the most intrusive surveillance regime of any democracy in history. The powers we’re fighting undermine everything that’s core to our freedom and democracy: our right to protest, to express ourselves freely and to a fair trial, our free press and privacy. With so much public support behind us, we’re hopeful that we’ll be able to persuade our courts to restrain the more authoritarian tendencies of this Government.”

Concentration on specific powers

Liberty will argue that the following powers breach the British people’s rights:

*Bulk and ‘thematic’ hacking – the Act lets police and agencies access, control and alter electronic devices like computers, phones and tablets on an industrial scale, regardless of whether their owners are suspected of involvement in crime – leaving them vulnerable to further attack by hackers

*Bulk interception of communications content – the Act lets the state read texts, online instant messages and e-mails, and listen-in on calls en masse, without requiring suspicion of criminal activity

*Bulk acquisition of everybody’s communications data and Internet history – the Act forces communications companies and Internet Service Providers to retain and hand over records of everybody’s e-mails, phone calls and texts and entire web browsing history to State agencies to store, data-mine and profile at its will

*Bulk personal datasets – the Act allows agencies to acquire and link vast databases held by the public or private sector. These contain details on religion, ethnic origin, sexuality, political leanings and health problems, potentially on the entire population, and are “ripe for abuse and discrimination”

In December, the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) issued a historic judgement in a separate case brought by Tom Watson MP, represented by Liberty. It ruled that the UK Government is breaking the law by indiscriminately collecting the nation’s Internet activity and phone records and letting hundreds of public bodies grant themselves access to these personal details with no suspicion of serious crime and no independent sign-off, effectively rendering significant parts of the Investigatory Powers Act unlawful.

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014.

Related Posts