Home Secretary unveils new transparency measures for Taser use by police service

Home Secretary Amber Rudd

Home Secretary Amber Rudd

Home Secretary Amber Rudd has announced that, from next month, UK police forces will be required to collect and publish detailed data on all their uses of force – including Taser usage. Adopting the recommendations of the David Shaw Review into police use of force, Rudd said that officers will have to record the location and outcome of all CED usage, along with the ethnicity and age of those involved, with the first set of data being published locally by forces this coming summer.

The Home Secretary also stated that the rules being introduced would allow the increased safeguards and transparency required for the introduction of the new Taser X2 device.

All police use of force, including physical restraint, will be captured in the new statistical publications to be collected from 1 April and published by forces from July onwards. For the first time, the increased transparency and scrutiny will allow meaningful comparison of the effectiveness of different techniques and tactics.

“We ask police officers to put themselves in harm’s way in order to defend us,” outlined Rudd. “The use of force is a vital part of their powers, but when the police take the difficult decision to deploy force it’s also vital that those whom they serve can scrutinise this course of action. These new rules will introduce unprecedented transparency to this important subject and reinforce the proud British model of policing by consent. The Government is committed to improving the transparency and accountability of the police service’s use of force.”

David Shaw Review

In 2014, the (then) Home Secretary Theresa May asked former national police lead for conflict management, chief constable David Shaw, to lead a review into what data should be recorded and published.

Prime Minister Theresa May

Prime Minister Theresa May

Work has been undertaken by police forces to implement the new data collection system recommended by the Shaw Review by 1 April 2017. Forces will publish the information locally on a quarterly basis, and provide an annual snap-shot of the key information collected to the Home Office as part of the Annual Data Requirement for 2017-2018.

For the first time, these data will allow meaningful comparison of the effectiveness of different techniques, which will help in strengthening police training, tactics, decision-making and equipment procurement.

In authorising the new Taser, the Home Office has supported the police in an open and transparent procurement exercise to identify a new device that will eventually replace the current Taser X26.

Independent assessment process

As with the authorisation process for all less-lethal weapons, the X2 has undergone extensive evaluation. A full technical evaluation has been carried out by the Centre for Applied Science and Technology, and the results of that exercise – in addition to the outcomes from user handling trials, training and guidance materials – were submitted for an independent medical assessment by the Scientific Advisory Committee on the Medical Implications of Less-Lethal Weapons (SACMILL). The Committee confirmed that the medical implications of the Taser X2 are in line with those expected of a less-lethal weapon of this type.

Brandon Lewis: Minister for Policing and the Fire Service

Brandon Lewis: Minister for Policing and the Fire Service

Details of all CED deployments will be recorded by the police and shared with SACMILL on a regular basis to ensure its findings remain accurate.

Brandon Lewis, Minister for Policing and the Fire Service, explained: “The Government is committed to giving the police the tools they need in order to do their job effectively. We must ensure our officers have access to the very best and most up-to-date technology available. Tasers are an important tactical option for the police, particularly in potentially violent situations where other tactics have been considered or have failed.”

All officers who use Tasers have to go through a comprehensive training process. This includes educating officers to factor-in the potential vulnerability of the person (or persons) involved – as well as variables such as age and stature – when assessing each situation.

About the Author
Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications) Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting. In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector. In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute's George van Schalkwyk Award. An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award. Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site. Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media. Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014.

Related Posts