“Clarification on regulatory regime for private security industry essential” urges BSIA

James Kelly: CEO at the BSIA

James Kelly: CEO at the BSIA

The British Security Industry Association (BSIA) is calling for urgent clarification on the future of the regulatory regime for the private security industry. This follows on from the news that a security firm is being investigated by the Security Industry Authority (SIA) for allegedly supplying cloned badges to unlicensed stewards. The company in question isn’t a BSIA member.

“The industry has faced a great deal of uncertainty with regards to how it will be regulated in the future,” explained James Kelly, CEO at the BSIA. “This is an issue that has been ongoing for many years, despite overwhelming support from the industry for the transition to a new ‘lighter touch’ regulatory regime. A proposed system of business licensing for the security business sector received extensive backing from the industry, the Regulator and the Government following a consultation in 2012, but this is yet to materialise. This has left all stakeholders uncertain about the future regulatory framework which would govern its operations, as well as the cost of licensing.”

Kelly continued: “An Independent Review of the SIA was carried out in 2016 during which the BSIA lobbied for the reaffirmation of business licensing in place of the current system. The outcome of this review has been left in situ with successive Governments for almost a year and appears no closer to being published in the foreseeable future.”

In addition, Kelly stated: “Incidents such as the allegation of cloned badges being supplied to unlicensed stewards demonstrate the importance of clear and robust regulation for the security industry. A business licensing system would enable the Regulator to revoke a business’ licence and prevent them from operating within the industry should they fail to ensure that all of their personnel are properly licensed or carry out the required level of due diligence when sub-contracting work.”

The BSIA is now calling for the Government to urgently address the future of the regulatory regime for the private security industry. This starts with the results of the Independent Review of the SIA which, in Kelly’s opinion, “should be published as a priority.”

Members of the BSIA are required to meet the Trade Association’s stringent eligibility criteria which is an assurance that they comply with the relevant licensing requirements as well as British and European Standards for the services they provide to end users.

About the Author

Brian Sims BA (Hons) Hon FSyI, Editor, Risk UK (Pro-Activ Publications)

Beginning his career in professional journalism at The Builder Group in March 1992, Brian was appointed Editor of Security Management Today in November 2000 having spent eight years in engineering journalism across two titles: Building Services Journal and Light & Lighting.

In 2005, Brian received the BSIA Chairman’s Award for Promoting The Security Industry and, a year later, the Skills for Security Special Award for an Outstanding Contribution to the Security Business Sector.

In 2008, Brian was The Security Institute’s nomination for the Association of Security Consultants’ highly prestigious Imbert Prize and, in 2013, was a nominated finalist for the Institute’s George van Schalkwyk Award.

An Honorary Fellow of The Security Institute, Brian serves as a Judge for the BSIA’s Security Personnel of the Year Awards and the Securitas Good Customer Award.

Between 2008 and 2014, Brian pioneered the use of digital media across the security sector, including webinars and Audio Shows. Brian’s actively involved in 50-plus security groups on LinkedIn and hosts the popular Risk UK Twitter site.

Brian is a frequent speaker on the conference circuit. He has organised and chaired conference programmes for both IFSEC International and ASIS International and has been published in the national media.

Brian was appointed Editor of Risk UK at Pro-Activ Publications in July 2014.

Related Posts